Tag: time magazine
-
TIME Magazine Article – Eat Butter – Part 2
TIME magazine published an article by Bryan Walsh that appeared in TIME magazine on 23 June 2014.
The cover of the magazine asserts “Eat Butter. Scientists labeled fat the enemy. Why they were wrong.”
Unfortunately, much of the evidence that Walsh presents in the article “Don’t blame the fat” is simply wrong and misleading. Walsh states that between 1977-2012, egg consumption fell 9%, beef 37% and milk 72% (per capita).
For the period 1970 - 2000, total added fats (up 40%), dairy products (up 8%), cheese (up 107%), low fat milk (up 79%), all meat products (up 10%), poultry (up 89%) and fish (up 22%) increased. These significant increases were not included in Walsh’s report. All of these food products, even low fat milk, are high fat foods.
The total calories consumed also rose significantly by 24%.
Read more ➱ -
TIME Magazine Article – Eat Butter
It is with alarm that I read Bryan Walsh’s article Ending the War on Fat that was published in TIME magazine on 23 June 2014.
According to Walsh:
Keys' work became the foundation for a body of science implicating fat as a major risk factor for heart disease. The Seven Countries Study has been referenced close to 1 million times. But Keys' research had problems from the start. He cherry-picked his data.If the book has really been "referenced close to a million times", it means that it has been referenced close to 80 times every day, including weekends, since the book was published in 1980.
Walsh claims that Keys “cherry-picked” his data. It is evident that Walsh has confused with Keys’ 1953 paper Keys’ paper, Atherosclerosis, A Problem in Newer Public Health and his later study Seven Countries, A Multivariate Analysis of Death and Coronary Heart Disease.
Walsh fails to elaborate on how Keys “cherry picked” his data. Commencing in 1957, the Seven Countries Study studied 12,763 men in 16 regions in seven countries. What data was omitted from this study? How was the data “cherry-picked”?
Read more ➱
Font Resizer
Search
However, the study has been funded by the dairy and beef industries.
Discover how industry-funded research is deceiving the public.
Carbohydrates DO NOT cause diabetes
Truth and Belief
Discover why researchers, popular commentators and the food industry is more concerned with maintaining corporate profits than ensuring that we have valid health information.Who is going to get wealthy by encouraging people to eat their fruit and vegetables?
Featured Posts
Why Consume a WFPB Diet?Brief Overview of WFPB Diets
Introduction
Where do You Get Your Protein?
The Problem with Cow's Milk
Breast, Endometrium and Ovarian Cancers
Eating Red Meat is Not Natural
Taiwan, Buddhists and Moderation
Autoimmune Diseases, Biomimicry and Type 1 Diabetes
Glucose Tolerance
7th-day Adventists and Health
Worried about eating eggs?
How Cooking Changed Us
Deception from The BMJ
Endometriosis is Curable
Changes to our Health Indicators
Cause of Type 2 Diabetes
DNA, Genetics and Epigenetics
The Myth of Good and Bad Cholesterol
The Traditional Diet of Inuit
Wheat and the Distorted Views of William Davis
Center for Nutrition Studies

Last Modified
- Introduction - Malcolm Turnbull 24 August 2026
- A Reading List 24 August 2026
- Summary of the Advantages of a WFPB Diet 24 August 2026
- Diet Does Not Affect Breast Cancer? 24 August 2026
- Information About Breast, Endometrium and Ovarian Cancers 24 August 2026
- Impact of Corporate Funding 21 August 2026
- DNA, Genetics and Epigenetics 20 August 2026
- The Blood Group Diet - Peter D'Adamo 20 August 2026
